{"id":14961,"date":"2025-08-25T19:41:06","date_gmt":"2025-08-25T19:41:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/taxops.com\/?p=14961"},"modified":"2025-08-25T20:16:53","modified_gmt":"2025-08-25T20:16:53","slug":"colorados-netflix-case-streaming-is-taxable","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/taxops.com\/colorados-netflix-case-streaming-is-taxable\/","title":{"rendered":"Colorado\u2019s Netflix Case: Streaming Is Taxable"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<div style=\"height:41px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"536\" src=\"data:image\/gif;base64,R0lGODlhAQABAIAAAAAAAP\/\/\/yH5BAEAAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAIBRAA7\" data-src=\"https:\/\/taxops.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Netflix-Streaming-is-Taxable-Colorado-1-1024x536.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-14964 lazyload\" data-srcset=\"https:\/\/taxops.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Netflix-Streaming-is-Taxable-Colorado-1-1024x536.png 1024w, https:\/\/taxops.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Netflix-Streaming-is-Taxable-Colorado-1-980x513.png 980w, https:\/\/taxops.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Netflix-Streaming-is-Taxable-Colorado-1-480x251.png 480w\" sizes=\"(min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 480px) 480px, (min-width: 481px) and (max-width: 980px) 980px, (min-width: 981px) 1024px, 100vw\" \/><noscript><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"536\" src=\"https:\/\/taxops.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Netflix-Streaming-is-Taxable-Colorado-1-1024x536.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-14964 lazyload\" srcset=\"https:\/\/taxops.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Netflix-Streaming-is-Taxable-Colorado-1-1024x536.png 1024w, https:\/\/taxops.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Netflix-Streaming-is-Taxable-Colorado-1-980x513.png 980w, https:\/\/taxops.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Netflix-Streaming-is-Taxable-Colorado-1-480x251.png 480w\" sizes=\"(min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 480px) 480px, (min-width: 481px) and (max-width: 980px) 980px, (min-width: 981px) 1024px, 100vw\" \/><\/noscript><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>Colorado says streaming is taxable.\u00a0The Netflix ruling expands the sales tax on digital goods and could expand how Colorado and possibly other states treat modern digital services, like streaming.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">By <a href=\"https:\/\/taxops.com\/judith-vorndran\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" title=\"Judy Vorndran\">Judy Vorndran<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/taxops.com\/meredith-smith\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" title=\"Meredith Smith\">Meredith Smith<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In a landmark decision that could reshape how digital services are taxed, the Colorado Court of Appeals ruled that streaming services\u2014like those offered by Netflix\u2014constitute&nbsp;tangible personal property (TPP)&nbsp;and are therefore, subject to&nbsp;state sales tax. This July 2025 ruling could reshape how digital services are taxed across Colorado and beyond, and has stirred significant discussion among tax professionals, businesses, and policymakers alike.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Netflix originally applied for a refund on sales tax it had remitted for its streaming services, arguing that digital streaming is intangible and therefore, not taxable under Colorado law. While the lower court agreed, the Colorado Department of Revenue (DOR) appealed\u2014and won.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The appellate court leaned heavily on the idea that streamed content is&nbsp;perceptible to the senses\u2014you can see and hear it\u2014which makes it tangible under the state\u2019s definition. This interpretation hinges on language from Colorado\u2019s 1935 sales tax statute, which the court argued was broad enough to encompass modern digital goods, despite the technological evolution since its enactment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Legal Reasoning &amp; Impact<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The court\u2019s binary approach sidestepped deeper questions about digital ownership and service classification. Streaming services, though accessed digitally and temporarily, were deemed corporeal because they can be seen and heard. This reasoning bypassed more nuanced debates about the nature of digital goods, such as whether temporary access constitutes ownership or whether streaming is more akin to a service or amusement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Colorado Netflix case has significant consequences for taxpayers and businesses:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>Expanded Tax Base<\/em>. The court\u2019s decision paves the way for taxing a broader range of digital services, including other streaming platforms, Software-as-a-Service (SaaS), and downloadable software.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>Compliance Challenges<\/em>. Businesses operating in Colorado may face increased challenges in managing sales tax obligations, especially those without automated tax software or sales tax expertise necessary to understand and interpret the evolving definitions and enforcement practices.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>Jurisdictional Complexity<\/em>. The case highlights inconsistencies between state and home rule city tax rules, underscoring the need for greater uniformity in the treatment of digital goods across jurisdictions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Colorado\u2019s move aligns with a broader national trend. Of the 46 states (plus D.C.) that impose sales tax,&nbsp;about 30 now tax software and digital goods. While states like California and Florida remain partial holdouts, the momentum is clearly shifting toward broader digital taxation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>The Takeaway<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This case gives DOR broader authority to interpret tax law without legislative updates, which could create a domino effect by empowering other DORs to interpret existing laws more broadly\u2014without waiting on lawmakers. While this may streamline enforcement, it also raises concerns about transparency and taxpayer rights.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For tax professionals and businesses, the ruling highlights:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Digital services now taxable: Streaming joins e-books and music as a taxable digital good.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Broad precedent: Opens the door for taxing other platforms like Hulu and Disney+ &#8211; Sorry Mickey!<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Compliance challenges: Businesses must navigate inconsistent rules across state and local jurisdictions.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The takeaway is clear:&nbsp;stay vigilant.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">As digital services continue to evolve, so too will the tax policies that govern them. Businesses must be proactive in understanding their obligations and adapting their compliance strategies accordingly.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Contact your SALTovation team at <a href=\"https:\/\/taxops.com\/contact\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" title=\"Speak with an Advisor\">TaxOps <\/a>with your questions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>Disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and is not intended, nor should it be relied upon, as legal, tax, accounting or investment advice. You should consult with a competent professional to discuss specifics of your situation and the applicability of the information presented.&nbsp;<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:57px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-buttons is-content-justification-center is-layout-flex wp-container-core-buttons-is-layout-fe48e5de wp-block-buttons-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-button\"><a class=\"wp-block-button__link wp-element-button\" href=\"https:\/\/taxops.com\/contact\/\">Talk to a Business Tax Advocate<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:53px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Read more<\/h2>\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-latest-posts__list wp-block-latest-posts\"><li><a class=\"wp-block-latest-posts__post-title\" href=\"https:\/\/taxops.com\/auditor-independence-in-the-age-of-private-equity\/\">Auditor Independence in the Age of Private Equity: What CFOs Need to Know<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a class=\"wp-block-latest-posts__post-title\" href=\"https:\/\/taxops.com\/r-d-credits-for-software-companies\/\">R&amp;D Credits for Software Companies: Scrum Teams, Qualifiers, and Section 174 After OBBBA<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a class=\"wp-block-latest-posts__post-title\" href=\"https:\/\/taxops.com\/section-174-decoupling-what-tax-pros-need-to-know-state-by-state\/\">Section 174 Decoupling: What Tax Pros Need To Know State By State<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a class=\"wp-block-latest-posts__post-title\" href=\"https:\/\/taxops.com\/sean-espy-new-partner\/\">TaxOps Welcomes Sean Espy as Partner, Tax Minimization<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a class=\"wp-block-latest-posts__post-title\" href=\"https:\/\/taxops.com\/state-nexus-demystified-navigating-tax-compliance-after-wayfair-episode-1-2\/\">Your Tax Footprint Is Probably Bigger Than You Think: What Finance Leaders Need to Know About State Nexus<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Colorado says streaming is taxable.\u00a0The Netflix ruling expands the sales tax on digital goods and could expand how Colorado and possibly other states treat modern digital services, like streaming. By Judy Vorndran and Meredith Smith In a landmark decision that could reshape how digital services are taxed, the Colorado Court of Appeals ruled that streaming [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":14964,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"off","_et_pb_old_content":"<!-- wp:spacer {\"height\":\"41px\"} -->\n<div style=\"height:41px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n<!-- \/wp:spacer -->\n\n<!-- wp:image {\"id\":14221,\"sizeSlug\":\"large\",\"linkDestination\":\"none\"} -->\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img src=\"https:\/\/taxops.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/2025-Colorado-State-and-Local-Tax-Legislation-1024x576.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-14221\"\/><\/figure>\n<!-- \/wp:image -->\n\n<!-- wp:quote -->\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\"><!-- wp:paragraph {\"align\":\"center\"} -->\n<p class=\"has-text-align-center\"><em>Judy Vorndran, lead partner of state and local tax at TaxOps, testified before the Colorado Senate Finance Committee on January 28, 2025. She addressed SB25-018 and SB25-046, proposed legislation that would create a searchable database and enhance audit confidentiality. Below is a summary of her remarks<\/em>.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph {\"align\":\"center\"} -->\n<p class=\"has-text-align-center\"><em>Following testimony and discussion, the Finance Committee unanimously passed both bills. SB25-018 now moves to the Committee on Appropriations while SB25-046, as amended, has been referred to the full Senate and placed on the Senate consent calendar.<\/em> <\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph {\"align\":\"center\"} -->\n<p class=\"has-text-align-center\"><em>\"It was an amazing experience to look in all of their faces and explain why these laws make Colorado more competitive and are good for both government and taxpayers<\/em>,\"<em>  ~ Judy Vorndran <\/em><\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph --><\/blockquote>\n<!-- \/wp:quote -->\n\n<!-- wp:group {\"layout\":{\"type\":\"constrained\"}} -->\n<div class=\"wp-block-group\"><!-- wp:spacer {\"height\":\"34px\"} -->\n<div style=\"height:34px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n<!-- \/wp:spacer -->\n\n<!-- wp:heading {\"textAlign\":\"center\"} -->\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading has-text-align-center\">Testimony on SB25-018, Online Search of Sales and Use Tax, and SB25-046, Local Government Tax Audit Confidentiality Standards<\/h2>\n<!-- \/wp:heading -->\n\n<!-- wp:spacer {\"height\":\"42px\"} -->\n<div style=\"height:42px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n<!-- \/wp:spacer --><\/div>\n<!-- \/wp:group -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>Good afternoon, members of the <a href=\"https:\/\/leg.colorado.gov\/committees\/finance\/2024-regular-session\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" title=\"Senate Finance Committee\">Senate Finance Committee<\/a>. My name is <a href=\"https:\/\/taxops.com\/judith-vorndran\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" title=\"Judy Vorndran\">Judy Vorndran<\/a>. I am a partner in the tax specialty firm TaxOps and a member of the &nbsp;Sales and Use Tax Simplification Task Force.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>I am here to testify in support of two bills, SB25-018 and SB25-046. A summary of my statement follows.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:spacer {\"height\":\"43px\"} -->\n<div style=\"height:43px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n<!-- \/wp:spacer -->\n\n<!-- wp:heading {\"level\":3} -->\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">SB25-018, Online Search of Sales and Use Tax<\/h3>\n<!-- \/wp:heading -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>SB25-018 aims to create a searchable database for sales and use tax licenses and exemption certificates. This bill is crucial for improving transparency and compliance in our tax system.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:heading {\"level\":3} -->\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Key Points<\/h3>\n<!-- \/wp:heading -->\n\n<!-- wp:list -->\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\"><!-- wp:list-item -->\n<li><strong>Importance of a Searchable Database:<\/strong><\/li>\n<!-- \/wp:list-item -->\n\n<!-- wp:list-item -->\n<li>SB25-018 proposes the creation of a database at the state and department of revenue level, allowing taxpayers to look up licenses and entities.<\/li>\n<!-- \/wp:list-item -->\n\n<!-- wp:list-item -->\n<li><strong>Benefits for Taxpayers:<\/strong><ol><li>Having access to a searchable database would be a significant advantage for taxpayers. It would help them ensure that vendors are properly licensed and collecting the correct tax amounts.<\/li><\/ol><!-- wp:list {\"ordered\":true} -->\n<ol class=\"wp-block-list\"><!-- wp:list-item -->\n<li>This measure would also align Colorado with other states, such as Texas, which already have similar databases in place. These databases have proven to be extremely helpful for taxpayers in those states.<\/li>\n<!-- \/wp:list-item --><\/ol>\n<!-- \/wp:list --><\/li>\n<!-- \/wp:list-item -->\n\n<!-- wp:list-item -->\n<li><strong>Improved Compliance:<\/strong><!-- wp:list {\"ordered\":true} -->\n<ol class=\"wp-block-list\"><!-- wp:list-item -->\n<li>The searchable database would facilitate better compliance with tax laws. Taxpayers would be able to verify the status of vendors and themselves, reducing the risk of errors and ensuring accurate tax collection.<\/li>\n<!-- \/wp:list-item --><\/ol>\n<!-- \/wp:list --><\/li>\n<!-- \/wp:list-item --><\/ul>\n<!-- \/wp:list -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>SB25-018 is a vital step towards enhancing transparency and compliance in Colorado's tax system. I urge the Committee to support this bill and help create a more efficient and taxpayer-friendly environment.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:spacer {\"height\":\"46px\"} -->\n<div style=\"height:46px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n<!-- \/wp:spacer -->\n\n<!-- wp:heading {\"level\":3} -->\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">SB25-046, Local Government Tax Audit Confidentiality Standards<\/h3>\n<!-- \/wp:heading -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>SB25-046 addresses the confidentiality standards for local government sales or use tax audits. This bill would both protect taxpayer information and ensure fairer audit practices.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:heading {\"level\":3} -->\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Key Points<\/h3>\n<!-- \/wp:heading -->\n\n<!-- wp:list {\"ordered\":true} -->\n<ol class=\"wp-block-list\"><!-- wp:list-item -->\n<li>Confidentiality Concerns:<ol><li>SB25-046 aims to establish uniform confidentiality standards for local government tax audits. This is important because third-party auditors often conduct these audits, and there are concerns about how taxpayer information is handled and shared.<\/li><\/ol><!-- wp:list {\"ordered\":true} -->\n<ol class=\"wp-block-list\"><!-- wp:list-item -->\n<li>Currently, third-party auditors are not always licensed professionals, and there is no regulation ensuring their confidentiality practices. This raises significant concerns about the protection of sensitive taxpayer information.<\/li>\n<!-- \/wp:list-item --><\/ol>\n<!-- \/wp:list --><\/li>\n<!-- \/wp:list-item -->\n\n<!-- wp:list-item -->\n<li>Issues with Third-Party Auditors:<ol><li>Many home-rule cities do not have captive auditors and rely on third-party auditors who may conduct audits on behalf of multiple jurisdictions. This can lead to inefficiencies and increased taxpayer burdens.<\/li><\/ol><!-- wp:list {\"ordered\":true} -->\n<ol class=\"wp-block-list\"><!-- wp:list-item -->\n<li>There are instances where third-party auditors may target large taxpayers, leading to multiple audits across different cities. This practice is also burdensome and raises concerns about the confidentiality of taxpayer information.<\/li>\n<!-- \/wp:list-item --><\/ol>\n<!-- \/wp:list --><\/li>\n<!-- \/wp:list-item -->\n\n<!-- wp:list-item -->\n<li>Need for Regulation:<ol><li>There is a need for stricter regulation and oversight of third-party auditors to ensure they adhere to uniform confidentiality standards. This includes establishing ethical and fiduciary duties similar to those required of licensed professionals.<\/li><\/ol><!-- wp:list {\"ordered\":true} -->\n<ol class=\"wp-block-list\"><!-- wp:list-item -->\n<li>The bill also highlights the importance of transparency in the contracts between cities and third-party auditors. These contracts should be subject to public scrutiny to ensure accountability.<\/li>\n<!-- \/wp:list-item --><\/ol>\n<!-- \/wp:list --><\/li>\n<!-- \/wp:list-item --><\/ol>\n<!-- \/wp:list -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>SB25-046 is essential for protecting taxpayer information and ensuring fair audit practices. I urge the Finance Committee to support this bill and help create a more transparent and accountable audit process. <\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>I would be happy to answer related questions you may have, and I thank you for the opportunity to weigh in on these important pieces of legislation.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:spacer {\"height\":\"57px\"} -->\n<div style=\"height:57px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n<!-- \/wp:spacer -->\n\n<!-- wp:buttons {\"layout\":{\"type\":\"flex\",\"justifyContent\":\"center\"}} -->\n<div class=\"wp-block-buttons\"><!-- wp:button -->\n<div class=\"wp-block-button\"><a class=\"wp-block-button__link wp-element-button\" href=\"https:\/\/taxops.com\/contact\/\">Talk to a Business Tax Advocate<\/a><\/div>\n<!-- \/wp:button --><\/div>\n<!-- \/wp:buttons -->\n\n<!-- wp:spacer {\"height\":\"53px\"} -->\n<div style=\"height:53px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n<!-- \/wp:spacer -->\n\n<!-- wp:separator -->\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n<!-- \/wp:separator -->\n\n<!-- wp:heading -->\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Read more<\/h2>\n<!-- \/wp:heading -->\n\n<!-- wp:latest-posts \/-->","_et_gb_content_width":"","spt_transcript":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[229,226],"tags":[252,1145,284,12,1144,1158,126,26,265,1135,492,1134,18,19,316,1136,30,810,101,799,605,262,79,267,620,80,712,1138,1137,74],"class_list":["post-14961","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-state-and-local","category-tax-news","tag-accountant","tag-advocate","tag-cfo","tag-colorado","tag-colorado-society-of-cpa","tag-continuous-education","tag-cpa","tag-cpe","tag-finance-professional","tag-iaas","tag-leadership","tag-saas","tag-sales-and-use-tax","tag-sales-tax","tag-salt","tag-software-providers","tag-state-and-local-tax","tag-state-income-tax","tag-state-tax","tag-tax-advisor","tag-tax-automation","tag-tax-planning","tag-tax-preparer","tag-tax-professional","tag-tax-professionals","tag-tax-provider","tag-tax-school","tag-tax-tools","tag-tax-vendors","tag-taxops"],"aioseo_notices":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/taxops.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Netflix-Streaming-is-Taxable-Colorado-1.png","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/taxops.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14961","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/taxops.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/taxops.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/taxops.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/taxops.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14961"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/taxops.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14961\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":14965,"href":"https:\/\/taxops.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14961\/revisions\/14965"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/taxops.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/14964"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/taxops.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14961"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/taxops.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14961"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/taxops.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14961"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}